Skip to main content

Clinging verus Love

The Buddha recommended five daily recollections as a catalyst for spiritual practice: “I am of the nature to grow old, sick and die; I will be separated from all that I love; my peace of mind rests dependent on the quality of my actions."

While these reflections may at first appear grim, it is important to note that they do place happiness within our control. Furthermore, it is necessary and foundational for any serious spiritual inquiry to remind us of the fragility of the human condition, as the delusion that “there’ll always be another day” needlessly delays the efforts required to develop lasting inner peace; skillful attributes such as forgiveness, gratitude or acceptance are not easy to sustain. And so day in and out we must return to the bedrock: we live in bodies without guarantees for endurance or health, and we live dependent on conditions that are constantly in flux.

Now, it is not uncommon to misinterpret this and other teachings as an instruction to detach and distance ourselves from those we love, for there will come a time of inevitable separation. Given the preponderance of this misapprehension, its worthwhile to explore how the dharma’s insights on clinging can help us understand the murky boundaries that distinguish love and skillful attachment from less agreeable qualities of delusional attachment.

Naturally the key to living without clinging rests on a clear understanding of what is actually meant by “clinging” (upadana in pali); after all it would be a shame to let go of something that is useful, while continuing to hold on to that which causes suffering. So, let’s review the Buddha’s four types of unskillful clinging:
1) clinging to that which only brings short term sensual pleasures
2) clinging to our subjective views and opinions as if they’re lasting and universal truths
3) clinging to habits and rituals that are not essential to lasting serenity
4) clinging to fixed views of self or identity

Note that none of the above asks us to relinquish loved ones (the spiritual journey, after all, is not limited to nuns and monks in monasteries). Additionally, the Buddha repeatedly instructed that there is nothing unskillful about constantly returning to lovingkindness, gratitude or appreciation, for such practices and states of mind are not contingent upon changing conditions nor inevitably short term if we can sustain them. Its needless to believe our relationships compromise our spiritual efforts; so long as we maintain balanced spiritual efforts, any care and affection we show to significant others, children, parents or friends, are wonderful opportunities for our practice. While its important to expand our kindness to include as many beings as possible, we have to start somewhere!

To love while maintaining insight into the Buddha’s teachings on clinging, we are, of course, asked to revise any unrealistic expectations we bring to relationships. For example, letting go of the delusion that there’ll always be time to forgive that which could be pardoned, to express care or appreciation, to offer our attention and time when it could provide consolation. Another requirement is understanding that no matter how much we want our loved ones to live without distress, there is no immunity to pain. Example: when a child grows to adult years, spiritual life asks us to develop even greater degrees of equanimity, given the insight that we cannot spare them from the inevitable frustrations that arise in life.

When our relationships are founded on clinging we find love driven not by the strength of appreciation, but the agitation of control; in this case our care often gives way to worrying; humane concern is confused with continual and unbalanced unease. Sadly, our beliefs and views about how loved ones should behave only offer us the illusion of control; acknowledging and accepting their actual behaviors is difficult, and may ask us to experience a sense powerless and unease; yet this is the price of true, sustaining relationships. Wanting our loved ones to be free of addictions will do nothing to ease their burdens.

So the truest form of love demands relinquishing as many fixed ideas as we can that limit how we want others to behave. Experience will reveal that trying to steer or push others towards smart decisions is far less efficient than providing a foundation of support or a safe shoulder to rest on. To live without clinging requires us to be clear between that which distinguishes Love and Dependency, Connection from Control.


Popular posts from this blog

Is There Life on Earth?

Our ancestors knew that physical proximity, being seen in the eye of others via direct, face-to-face contact was, and is, the core foundation of mental and physical health. Without the emotional co-regulation that community provides, our sympathetic nervous systems never switch off, we’re forever on guard. 
Remember: The human species survived and thrived because we lived in tribes where individuals labored not just for themselves, but the benefit of others; we didn't survive by outrunning predators, for we are without wings, shells or claws; we survive because we are pack animals, wired to connect, our primary means to survive threats and heal our wounds; without connection chronic stress is the inevitable result.
     Loneliness is not a spiritual state to seek, it’s a health risk: the bonds of community, emotional mirroring, acceptance heal our wounds, help us grow, produce states of ease and confidence. People in communities live significantly longer, healthier lives.

5 ways to resist obsessive thoughts (Vitakkasanthana)

The mind can be thought of as a committee
Our thoughts are present by many "voices," some skillful and unskillful
W there are some skillful voices in there, focusing on useful ideas, there are also the many voices in the "committee" that cause us suffering by advancing and encouraging useless, stress inducing ideas, plans, worries.

Some examples of unskillful, stress producing obsessions
—are dedictated to figuring out the worst possible outcomes (fear) of any situation
—fixate on unknowable future events, i.e. what will we experience later in life?
—try to figure out what other people are thinking about us
—compare ourselves with others, especially in material concerns
in general, the buddha broke these down the thoughts of craving, aversion and delusion.

How unskillful internal voices persuade us
some of these committee members try to get their way by
—most work by repeating the same thought over and over
—some split into thousands of variations that seem different, but are …

Buddhism and the Bilateral Brain: A Brief Sketch of Ideas Ranging from the Ancient Greeks, Early Buddhism, Nietzsche and a Smattering of Neuroscience

In Greek mythology, Apollo was the god of the reason and logic, appealing to the ideals of precision and abstract purity. Dionysus was the god of the spontaneous, the emotional, embodied, often irrational instinct. These gods were not considered to be antagonistic but rather complimentary.
Today, from the vantage of contemporary neuropsychology, especially in the works of Iain McGilchrist, Allan Schore and Robert Ornstein, we can readily note how these twin gods neatly represented the asymmetrical brain: • Apollo depicts the perspective of the left hemisphere, which represents the world in static ideas; reality is comprised of separate and fragmented objects, abstracted from their context; reality is separated into parts. The kind of attention is inherently dualistic and isolating—self versus other, me versus you, humankind versus nature; this attention tends to represent the fluid and organic as lifeless, static, in language or symbols. • Dionysus depicts the worldview of the r…